Project acceptance c的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到附近那裡買和營業時間的推薦產品

European Solidarity in Times of Crisis: Insights from a Thirteen-Country Survey

為了解決Project acceptance c的問題，作者Gerhards, Jürgen,Lengfeld, Holger,Ignácz, Zsófia 這樣論述：

Jürgen Gerhards is Professor of Sociology at the Freie Universität Berlin. His research interests include comparative cultural sociology, and sociology of European integration. His most recent publications include Global Inequality in the Academic System: Effects of National and University Symbolic

Capital on International Academic Mobility (Higher Education, 2018, with S. Hans & D. Drewksi); Social Class and Transnational Human Capital. How Upper and Middle Class Parents Prepare Their Children for Globalization (Routledge, 2017, with S. Hans & S. Carlson); European Citizenship and Social Inte

gration in the European Union (Routledge, 2015, with H. Lengfeld); Transnational Linguistic Capital. Explaining English Proficiency in 27 Countries (International Sociology, 2014); European Integration, Equality Rights and People’s Beliefs. (European Sociological Review, 2013, with H. Lengfeld); Fro

m Hasan to Herbert: Name Giving Patterns of Immigrant Parents between Acculturation and Ethnic Maintenance (American Journal of Sociology, 2009, with S. Hans); Free to Move? The Acceptance of Free Movement of Labour and Non-Discrimination among Citizens of Europe (European Societies, 2008).Holger Le

ngfeld is Professor of Sociology at Leipzig University and Research Fellow at the German Institute of Economic Research Berlin. His research focuses on social stratification, inequality and European social integration. Among his publications are Does Physiological Distribution of Blood parameters in

Children Depend on Socioeconomic Status? Results of a German Cross-sectional Study (BMJ Open, 2018, with K. Rieger, M. Vogel, C. Engel, U. Ceglarek, K. Harms, U. Wurst, M. Richter, W. Kiess); Drifting Apart or Converging? Grades of Non-traditional and Traditional Students over the Course of Their S

tudies (Higher Education, 2017, with T. Brändle); Do European Citizens Support the Idea of a European Welfare State? (International Sociology, 2016, with J. Gerhards & J. Häuberer); The Long Shadow of Occupation: Volunteering in Retirement (Rationality and Society, 2016, with J. Ordemann); European

Citizenship and Social Integration in the European Union (Routledge, 2015, with J. Gerhards); The Growing Remit of the EU in Climate Change Policy and Citizens’ Support across the Union (Journal of European Social Policy, 2008, with J. Gerhards).Zsófia S. Ignácz is a lecturer and researcher at the I

nstitute of Sociology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany. Her main research interests include social justice and methodological topics. Her most recent publications are The Remains of the Socialist Legacy: The Influence of Socialist Socialization on Attitudes toward Income Inequality (Societies,

2018); Social Cohesion and Its Correlates (Comparative Sociology, 2018, with J. Delhey, K. Boehnke, G. Dragolov, M. Larsen, J. Lorenz, M. Koch); Wage Distribution Fairness in Post-Socialist Countries (Routledge, 2018); Social Cohesion in the Western World (Springer, 2016, with G. Dragolov, J. Lorenz

, J. Delhey, K. Boehnke & K. Unzicker).Florian K. Kley is a researcher and lecturer at the Institute of Sociology, Leipzig University, Germany. Previously, he was a researcher in the HORIZON 2020-Project, Solidarity in European Societies: Empowerment, Social Justice and Citizenship (SOLIDUS) at the

Chair for Societal Institutions and Social Change at the Institute of Sociology at Leipzig University. His main research fields are European social integration, social stratification research, and quantitative data analysis.Maximilian Priem is a data analyst at DIW Econ GmbH, Germany. Previously he

worked as a researcher in the project European Solidarity at the Chair of Macrosociology at the Freie Universität Berlin. His main research interests include European sociology, inequality and living conditions. His most recent publication is Everyone Happy: Living Standards in Germany 25 Years afte

r Reunification (DIW Economic Bulletin, 2014, with J. Schupp).

Prosocial: Using Evolutionary Science to Build Productive, Equitable, and Collaborative Groups

為了解決Project acceptance c的問題，作者Atkins, Paul W. B./ Wilson, David Sloan/ Hayes, Steven C./ Ryan, 這樣論述：

A groundbreaking, comprehensive program for designing effective and socially equitable groups of all sizes--from businesses and social justice groups to global organizations. Whether you work in business or schools, volunteer in neighborhoods or church organizations, or are involved in social justic

e and activism, you understand the enormous power of groups to enact powerful and lasting change in the world. But how exactly do you design, build, and sustain effective groups?Based on the work of Nobel Prize winning economist Elinor Ostrom and grounded in contextual behavioral science, evolutiona

ry science, and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), Prosocial presents a practical, step-by-step approach to help you energize and strengthen your business or organization. Using the Prosocial model, you'll learn to design groups that are more harmonious, have better member or employee retentio

n, have better relationships with other groups or business partners, and have more success and longevity.Most importantly, you'll learn to target the characteristics that foster cooperation and collaboration--key ingredients for any effective group. Paul W.B. Atkins, PhD, is director of the Prosoc

ial Institute, and senior research fellow with the Institute for Positive Psychology and Education at Australian Catholic University (ACU). His career has combined research and practice helping groups to thrive. His research has been published in the world’s leading management and psychology journal

s. As a facilitator and coach, he has helped thousands of managers and leaders to improve their team leadership, conflict resolution, situational awareness, and well-being.David Sloan Wilson, PhD, is president of The Evolution Institute, and SUNY distinguished professor of biology and anthropology a

t Binghamton University. He applies evolutionary theory to all aspects of humanity, in addition to the biological world. His books include Darwin’s Cathedral, Evolution for Everyone, The Neighborhood Project, and Does Altruism Exist?Steven C. Hayes, PhD, is Nevada Foundation Professor in the behavio

r analysis program in the department of psychology at the University of Nevada, Reno. His career has focused on analysis of the nature of human language and cognition, and its application to the understanding and alleviation of human suffering and promotion of human prosperity. Among other associati

ons, Hayes has been president of the Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies (ABCT), and the Association for Contextual Behavioral Science (ACBS). His work has received several awards, including the Lifetime Achievement Award from ABCT. Foreword writer Richard M. Ryan, PhD, is a clinical

psychologist and codeveloper of self-determination theory (SDT), an internationally recognized leading theory of human motivation. He is professor at the Institute for Positive Psychology and Education at ACU.

行動裝置教育方案於腦中風患者之成效

為了解決Project acceptance c的問題，作者余秋菊 這樣論述：

背景與目的：衛生福利部統計2019年腦血管疾病是造成臺灣地區民眾十大死因的第4名，腦中風發生的6個月內有超過25%的病患導致嚴重失能，慢性疾病皆是腦中風的致病危險因子，針對這些疾病的治療及控制是可降低腦中風的發生率，故需長時間監控及配合慢性疾病藥物治療，改變飲食習慣及建立良好的健康生活型態，提供病患出院返家後疾病相關知識。護理人員扮演著教育者的角色，傳統護理指導大部份給予紙本單張及口頭教育，然而現今資訊科技的進步及行動網路3C產品的普及化，可提供即時、個別化，是目前臨床照護上最即時及有效率的方式。因此，本研究探討行動裝置教育方案於腦中風病患提升自我照顧知識、自我效能及避免憂鬱之成效。研究方法

：本研究在臺灣北部某醫學中心之神經內科病房及老年醫學病房進行收案，採兩組前、後測，隨機、單盲之實驗性研究設計，收案82位，包括實驗組40位(行動裝置教育方案)及控制組42位(常規護理)，分別於住院48小時內進行前測及介入，出院前24小時進行後測之施測。研究問卷包含腦中風自我照顧知識量表(Stroke Self-Care Knowledge)、腦中風自我效能量表(Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, SSEQ)、貝克憂鬱量表(Beck Depression Inventory, BDI)、健康指導內容滿意度之視覺類比量表(Visual Analogue Scal

e, VAS )，以套裝統計軟體SPSS 20.0版進行統計分析，進行描述性統計及推論性統計。描述性統計以次數分配、百分比、平均數、標準差、最大值及最小值呈現研究對象之人口學資料及疾病特徵；推論性統計以獨立樣本t檢定、卡方比較兩組在人口學基本屬性、疾病特徵、腦中風自我照顧知識、腦中風自我效能、憂鬱及介入措施滿意度之差異，運用廣義估計方程式(generalized estimating equation, GEE)檢定兩組之前、後測腦中風自我照顧知識、腦中風自我效能及憂鬱改善成效，再以獨立樣本t檢定統計比較兩組介入措施滿意度之差異。研究結果：本研究之研究對象為老年、男性、已婚、退休、高中職、佛道

教為主，共病指數(Charlson Comorbidity Index, CCI)平均值為2.28，過去病史以高血壓為主、其次為糖尿病。行動裝置教育方案介入後兩組腦中風自我照顧知識於組別主效果( β = 6.88, SE = .78, p < .001)、時間主效果( β = -6.15, SE = .71, p < .001)、組別與時間交互作用( β = -6.93, SE = .89, p < .001)皆呈統計學上顯著差異；腦中風自我效能(SSEQ)於組別主效果( β = 16.80, SE = 2.46, p < .001)、時間主效果( β = -33.66, SE = 2.78,

p < .001)、組別與時間交互作用( β = -6.46, SE = 4.02, p < .001)皆呈統計學上顯著差異；憂鬱(BDI)改善成效於組別主效果( β = -7.29, SE = 1.50, p < .001)、時間主效果( β = 8.37, SE = 1.77, p < .001)、組別與時間交互作用( β= 5.28, SE = 2.09, p < .001)皆呈統計學上顯著差異；以獨立樣本t檢定統計方式比較實驗組(行動裝置教育方案)與控制組(常規護理)的介入措施滿意度，呈統計學上顯著差異( p < .05)，即表示此行動裝置教育方案介入措施的滿意度比常規護理有明顯成

效。結論：本研究結果證實透過行動裝置教育方案於腦中風患者，可以有效提升腦中風自我照顧知識、腦中風自我效能程度成改善憂鬱程度，行動裝置教育方案較傳統口頭健康指導有較高的介入滿意度。臨床與實務應用：在實證依據基礎下，使用行動裝置教育方案於腦中風患者之成效更較傳統口頭健康指導成效佳，且具有統計學上顯著差異。因應3C化數位時代來臨，手機及網路使用普及化，希望能藉由腦中風行動裝置教育方案方便性、健康指導內容生動性，且有具個別性的優點，能促進提升臨床護理人員在病患住院期間提供返家後健康指導內容，更能減少的時間人力成本。對於需要長期復健治療之腦中風患者更能提供持續性的照護內容，藉由操作行動裝置教育方案過程，

更可以促進患者與家人之間的親情互動，值得在臨床上推廣。