社區生活資訊情報站論文書籍站
Legislate a law的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到附近那裡買和營業時間的推薦產品
Legislate a law的問題，我們搜遍了碩博士論文和台灣出版的書籍，推薦Lidberg, Johan (EDT)/ Muller, Denis (EDT)寫的 In the Name of Security - Secrecy, Surveillance and Journalism 和Barton, Uzma Ashraf的 Rethinking Regulation of International Finance: Law, Policy and Institutions都 可以從中找到所需的評價。
另外網站China legislation | Practical Law也說明：Understanding Chinese local legislation. Accounting, finance, legal industry, securities, statistics and taxation law. Accounting law.
這兩本書分別來自 和所出版 。
中央警察大學 法律學研究所 周慶東所指導 廖國政的 論精神障礙責任減免之探討-以責任能力為核心 （2021），提出Legislate a law關鍵因素是什麼，來自於責任、責任能力、辨識能力、控制能力、精神疾病、精神障礙。
而第二篇論文國立臺灣大學 財務金融學研究所 何耕宇所指導 蔡侑廷的 董監事責任保險的利與弊：公司價值與風險之觀點 （2021），提出因為有 董監事責任保險、公司價值、異質性風險、監督效果、道德風險、Heckman兩階段模型的重點而找出了 Legislate a law的解答。
最後網站Laws & Regulations Database of The Republic of China則補充：OPERATING BY THE WORKING GROUP OF THE R.O.C LAWS & REGULATIONS DATABASE, MINISTRY OF JUSTICE. NO. 130, Sec. 1, Chongqing S. Rd., Taipei, 100204, Taiwan(R.O.C.).
In the Name of Security - Secrecy, Surveillance and Journalism
為了解決Legislate a law 的問題，作者Lidberg, Johan (EDT)/ Muller, Denis (EDT) 這樣論述：
The terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York on 11 September 2001 saw the start of the so-called war on terror. The aim of 'In the Name of Security - Secrecy, Surveillance and Journalism'is to assess the impact of surveillance and other security measures on in-depth public interest jo
urnalism. How has the global fear-driven security paradigm sparked by 11 September affected journalism? Moves by governments to expand the powers of intelligence and security organizations and legislate for the retention of personal data for several years have the potential to stall investigative jo
urnalism. Such journalism, with its focus on accountability and scrutiny of powerful interests in society, is a pillar of democracy.Investigative journalism informs society by providing information that enables citizens to have input into democratic processes. But will whistleblowers acting in publi
c interest in future contact reporters if they risk being exposed by state and corporate surveillance? Will journalists provide fearless coverage of security issues when they risk jail for reporting them?At the core of 'In the Name of Security - Secrecy, Surveillance and Journalism' sits what the au
thors have labeled the 'trust us dilemma'. Governments justify passing, at times, oppressive and far-reaching anti-terror laws to keep citizens safe from terror. By doing so governments are asking the public to trust their good intentions and the integrity of the security agencies. But how can the p
ublic decide to trust the government and its agencies if it does not have access to information on which to base its decision?'In the Name of Security - Secrecy, Surveillance and Journalism' takes an internationally comparative approach using case studies from the powerful intelligence-sharing group
known as the Five Eyes consisting of the US, Canada, the UK, Australia and New Zealand. Chapters assessing a selection of EU countries and some of the BRICS countries provide additional and important points of comparison to the English-speaking countries that make up the Five Eyes.The core question
s in the book are investigated and assessed in the disciplines of journalism studies, law and international relations. The topics covered include an overview and assessment of the latest technological developments allowing the mass surveillance of large populations including the use of drones (Unman
ned Aerial Vehicles). Johan Lidberg is associate professor in journalism in the School of Media, Film and Journalism, at Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, where he is also the research coordinator and deputy head of the journalism department.Denis Muller is senior research fellow at the C
entre for Advancing Journalism, Melbourne University, Australia.
Legislate a law進入發燒排行的影片
Taiwan, beacon of Democracy in Asia and the world
Is a self-governing country without a seat in the UN
China views it as a renegade province
And threatens to annihilate it by force
Taiwan’s president Tsai Ing-wen responds with
More human rights,
More democracy
and More freedom
On February 20th 2019
Taiwan is to legislate same-sex marriage law
Here is Taiwan Premier Su’s message to its people:
Hello, My fellow Taiwanese folks
As we all know, human society evolves constantly. For the longest time, there were prejudice towards the poor, women, blacks. They couldn’t even vote. Now all is respected, all is equal.
We used to think sexual attraction happen to opposite sex. We didn’t understand homosexuals. Ignorance leads to fear. Fear leads to oppression. Even I was once ignorant as a kid.
Now it is medically proven. Homosexuals are born this way. It’s not a disease. It’s not contagious. You can’t nurture straights to gays, nor gays to straights.
Executive Yuan as the highest executive institution in Taiwan, we must act according to the law, we must respect the referendum results, we also must act according to the Grand Justice Interpretation of constitution court. Therefore, we will not amend the civil code law. The marriage between a man and a woman is intact as is.
As stated by the supreme court justice Interpretation No. 748, the union of same sex couples requires the equal protection of the freedom of marriage. Therefore, the Executive Yuan will enact on legislation of such law. Since many still debate on the naming of the law. We feel it is best not to muddle on the wording. Instead, the Executive Yuan will name it ‘J Y Interpretation No. 748 Enact Law’ and send it to legislature for review.
I hope all will understand that, according to the Grand Justice Interpretation, if the Executive doesn’t enact, if the Legislature doesn’t pass before May 24th, same-sex marriage will still be allowed to register under current Civil Code. Therefore, I ask the legislature to legislate soon.
I will also say this to my fellow Taiwanese: No matter you’re gay or straight, we are all on the same side, living together on this land, we are all here, between heaven and earth. I sincerely look forward to all, to tolerate the different, to kindly treat one another, and make Taiwan a country that respects and be kind to one another.
Thank you, and, good night.
論精神障礙責任減免之探討-以責任能力為核心
為了解決Legislate a law 的問題，作者廖國政 這樣論述：
何謂責任?一般而言，責任是適用於精神狀態正常人之規範，也只有正常人才能期待其遵守國家之規範而負其責任，然而，對於精神障礙者犯罪行為要如何處罰?是否能期待其遵守規範?其責任能力要如何判斷?醫學要如何判定行為時之精神狀態?法律效果要如何認定?乃為本文所欲探討「責任」之議題。本文主要目的乃是探討精神病患者責任之問題。因而從責任概念開始著手，接續為責任能力之研究及精神醫學影響責任能力之判斷加以探討。責任在各責任理論當中是以道義責任論及規範責任論為主要理論根據，是以「自由意思」與「期待可能性」作為判斷責任非難可能性之依據。而責任能力規範於我國刑法第19條，其條文是以混和立法體例呈現，在生理上是以精神障
礙與心智缺陷作為影響辨識能力及控制能力之心理要素的原因，並以行為時有精神障礙作為影響責任能力之基準。 本文在蒐集資料過程中，也發現在精神醫學領域鑑定異常者是否具備控制能力時，必須連同認識能力及控制能力一併加以鑑定，始能判定是否有控制能力，從而本文認為，我國在心理要素上應以齊備制立法，而非擇一制。本文從精神醫學文獻中發現，精神障礙與心智缺陷起因於疾病所導致，而犯罪行為主要是因其疾病症狀所引起，症狀的發作有其階段性，並非一瞬間即能發作，因而在精神鑑定其行為時之精神狀態，必須根據患者過往病史來判斷行為時是否有疾病發作之可能，無從根據其瞬間發作判斷其有無疾病存在。實務並依精神鑑定之結果作為法官最後之心
證，判斷精神障礙者之犯罪行為責任能力減免之依據。本文將以文獻探討法並蒐集相關法學書籍、判例、判決、期刊、論文、精神醫學書籍等文獻作為寫作之內容，期盼能從本文中了解精神障礙者犯罪行為責任能力之認定以及立法模式，並結合精神醫學之判定，以釐清及消彌大眾之疑慮。
Rethinking Regulation of International Finance: Law, Policy and Institutions
A PHP Error was encountered
Severity: Warning
Message: file_put_contents(/var/www/html/prints/public/images/books_new/F01/413/39/F014139897.jpg): failed to open stream: Permission denied
Filename: helpers/global_helper.php
Line Number: 140
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/prints/application/helpers/global_helper.php
Line: 140
Function: file_put_contents
File: /var/www/html/prints/application/views/article_v2.php
Line: 248
Function: coverWebp_online
File: /var/www/html/prints/application/controllers/Pages.php
Line: 662
Function: view
File: /var/www/html/prints/public/index.php
Line: 319
Function: require_once
A PHP Error was encountered
Severity: Warning
Message: getimagesize(/var/www/html/prints/public/images/books_new/F01/413/39/F014139897.jpg): failed to open stream: No such file or directory
Filename: helpers/global_helper.php
Line Number: 62
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/prints/application/helpers/global_helper.php
Line: 62
Function: getimagesize
File: /var/www/html/prints/application/helpers/global_helper.php
Line: 142
Function: coverWebp
File: /var/www/html/prints/application/views/article_v2.php
Line: 248
Function: coverWebp_online
File: /var/www/html/prints/application/controllers/Pages.php
Line: 662
Function: view
File: /var/www/html/prints/public/index.php
Line: 319
Function: require_once
A PHP Error was encountered
Severity: Notice
Message: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool
Filename: helpers/global_helper.php
Line Number: 64
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/prints/application/helpers/global_helper.php
Line: 64
Function: _error_handler
File: /var/www/html/prints/application/helpers/global_helper.php
Line: 142
Function: coverWebp
File: /var/www/html/prints/application/views/article_v2.php
Line: 248
Function: coverWebp_online
File: /var/www/html/prints/application/controllers/Pages.php
Line: 662
Function: view
File: /var/www/html/prints/public/index.php
Line: 319
Function: require_once
A PHP Error was encountered
Severity: Notice
Message: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool
Filename: helpers/global_helper.php
Line Number: 66
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/prints/application/helpers/global_helper.php
Line: 66
Function: _error_handler
File: /var/www/html/prints/application/helpers/global_helper.php
Line: 142
Function: coverWebp
File: /var/www/html/prints/application/views/article_v2.php
Line: 248
Function: coverWebp_online
File: /var/www/html/prints/application/controllers/Pages.php
Line: 662
Function: view
File: /var/www/html/prints/public/index.php
Line: 319
Function: require_once
A PHP Error was encountered
Severity: Notice
Message: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool
Filename: helpers/global_helper.php
Line Number: 68
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/prints/application/helpers/global_helper.php
Line: 68
Function: _error_handler
File: /var/www/html/prints/application/helpers/global_helper.php
Line: 142
Function: coverWebp
File: /var/www/html/prints/application/views/article_v2.php
Line: 248
Function: coverWebp_online
File: /var/www/html/prints/application/controllers/Pages.php
Line: 662
Function: view
File: /var/www/html/prints/public/index.php
Line: 319
Function: require_once
為了解決Legislate a law 的問題，作者Barton, Uzma Ashraf 這樣論述：
International Banking and Finance Law series-33About this book: Rethinking Regulation of International Finance encapsulates the most important aspects of the development and operation of the international financial system. This book questions the fundamental basis of the existing international finan
cial architecture (soft law) and explores the need for a compliance-based model based on legitimacy of regulations and accountability of the regulatory bodies in international financial stability. Why have financial standards and institutions almost always failed to effectively predict and respond t
o real-world financial crises? The answer, as this challenging book shows, is that international financial law suffers from a persistent lack of judicial or quasi-judicial enforcement mechanisms, leaving flaws in the structure of the international financial system that lead inevitably to excesses th
at threaten the public good of global financial stability. The author, an internationally renowned legal expert on financial and fiscal reforms, responds to the increasingly urgent call for rethinking the structure and the functioning of international financial law and argues that a resilient proced
ural mechanism with judicious regulatory substance can make the financial system safer for all actors, including the taxpayers of not only the Member States but also the unrepresented countries. To this end, the book suggests short-to-medium term reforms within the existing financial system and for
longer-term it recommends an unconventional alternative that takes risk away from the market and thereby makes every stakeholder accountable to the system.What's in this book: This book asserts that the existing financial architecture repeatedly fails to safeguard the essential public good of finan
cial stability and this failure perpetuates higher risks in financial markets. Centering on the concept of enforcement - which continues to be an unresolved issue in the discipline of international financial law - the analysis describes the likely contours of hard-law regulatory reform. It weighs th
e pros and cons of much-talked-about regulatory and policy issues such as the following and more: policy implications from the transformation of finance from a domestic to an international concept;new or revised supervisory and regulatory bodies with redefined mandate, jurisdictions and powers;possi
bility of a treaty-based structure similar to the European Union's integration framework; andconsolidation of crisis-prevention and crisis-management policies.The analysis takes into account instances from trade and monetary systems pertinent to the development of the discipline of international fin
ancial law. The concluding chapter explores possibilities for putting in place an asset-backed resilient financial system based on risk sharing that is empowered to legislate reform and authorized to seek compliance from its members.How this will help you: With its provision of unconventional alter
natives for further development of international financial law to realize stable, predictable and robust international markets - including early-warning systems and fully primed crisis-prevention mechanisms - the book explores the essential link between global financial stability, effective regulati
on and institutional development that will engender realistic global policy solutions. It will prove to be of great importance to regulatory and legal practitioners as well as to academic and think-tank scholars, and students.
董監事責任保險的利與弊：公司價值與風險之觀點
為了解決Legislate a law 的問題，作者蔡侑廷 這樣論述：
臺灣證券交易所於2008年規定上市櫃公司須揭露投保董監事責任保險（簡稱D&O責任保險）的相關資訊，且於2019年開始更強制所有上市櫃公司都必須投保。本研究藉由分析2008年至2018年期間上市櫃公司的投保狀況，利用Heckman兩階段模型，探討D&O責任保險保額對於公司價值和異質性風險的影響。本研究實證發現：(1) D&O責任保險保額與公司價值為顯著正相關，結果支持D&O責任保險的監督效果假說；(2) 對獨立董事比例較高的公司，D&O責任保險的監督效果會被減弱；(3) 對有財務困難的公司，D&O責任保險的監督效果會被加強；(4) 投保較高保額的D&O責任保險對於公司價值有正面影響，但在公司價
值提高的同時，公司面臨的異質性風險也隨之上升。本研究結果已減輕內生性問題且具穩健性，同時可作為主管機關制定D&O責任保險相關決策之參考。